H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2011 Croatia Open Umag first round 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #68 6-7(2) 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Ivan Dodig #107 Match data May 3, 2015 Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #82 6-4 3-6 6-2 Ivan Dodig #40 Match data Jul 28, 2011* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ivan Dodig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ivan Dodig
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ivan Dodig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ivan Dodig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.