H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Jan Hajek H2H: 2-0

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Hajek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2013 Italian Open first round 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jan Hajek
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #65 7-5 6-0 Jan Hajek #101 Match data May 14, 2013* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #61 6-3 6-1 Jan Hajek #98 Match data Mar 22, 2013* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jan Hajek #1,199 #71 644 1,740 27 71 27.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Jan Hajek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #76 1,535 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2007 2–13 13.3% #245 1,475 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #475 1,518 0 0
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2009 1–1 50.0% #103 1,547 0 0
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2010 10–19 34.5% #95 1,623 0 0
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2011 0–8 0.0% #141 1,595 0 0
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2012 4–7 36.4% #106 1,612 0 0
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2013 8–15 34.8% #106 1,699 0 0
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2014 0–3 0.0% #387 1,597 0 0
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Jan Hajek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 5 5 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 11 15 26.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — — — — — 8 37 45 17.8% 19 29 48 39.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 98/98 of Jan Hajek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Jan Hajek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2006 6/6 4.7 3.2 52.4% 61.9% 42.2% 49.1% 41.3% 53.6% 41.8%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2007 15/15 5.3 2.9 55.2% 63.4% 40.0% 52.3% 26.7% 52.4% 30.5%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2008 1/1 2.0 1.0 56.1% 64.9% 41.4% 0.0% 16.7% 54.5% 33.0%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2009 2/2 5.0 2.0 68.1% 64.2% 51.6% 60.4% 54.8% 60.2% 36.1%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2010 29/29 2.0 2.0 62.8% 62.2% 48.1% 54.3% 34.5% 56.5% 35.7%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2011 8/8 2.4 2.0 62.3% 56.5% 43.5% 49.4% 15.0% 51.3% 30.8%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2012 11/11 2.9 1.7 64.5% 68.3% 52.9% 50.8% 37.5% 62.2% 37.1%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2013 23/23 3.3 1.3 65.6% 62.6% 50.7% 61.4% 36.9% 58.5% 37.4%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2014 3/3 1.3 2.3 74.9% 53.3% 47.2% 38.3% 58.3% 50.7% 27.4%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 98/98 3.2 2.0 62.2% 62.5% 47.2% 53.6% 34.0% 56.2% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Jan Hajek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1527 106.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1510 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2006 1536 111.5 -3.43 +1.67 0.900 47.5% -27 — — 41.7% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.14
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2007 1476 103.6 -6.19 -3.97 0.640 41.5% -32 +41 — 28.6% -1.94 1–3 (25%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.05
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2008 1519 106.4 -3.27 +3.81 0.725 42.2% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.19
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2009 1547 112.3 +0.81 +0.02 0.906 48.8% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 1–0 — -0.23
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2010 1624 125.5 -4.63 -0.43 0.821 46.4% -105 +25 — 36.2% -1.23 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.53
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2011 1596 122.0 -6.00 -2.18 0.633 41.3% -36 — — 5.9% -3.12 0–1 0–1 — -0.39
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2012 1612 116.8 -1.12 -0.46 0.982 48.3% -82 +53 — 40.0% -0.55 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.09
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2013 1700 131.0 -3.45 +1.02 0.902 48.0% -152 +76 — 33.3% -1.07 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.18
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2014 1598 105.7 -3.42 -3.41 0.556 40.3% -111 — — 0.0% -3.80 — — — +0.35
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1741 125.6 -4.07 -0.69 0.804 45.7% -89 +50 — 32.1% -1.41 7–13 (35%) 12–12 (50%) 101.2 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.