H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs John Isner H2H: 1-2

John Isner holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while John Isner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2019 Miami Open third round 7-5 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Isner #9 7-5 7-6(6) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #86 Match data Mar 25, 2019* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #41 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(5) John Isner #9 Match data May 16, 2018* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
John Isner #24 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-1 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #19 Match data May 16, 2017* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas John Isner
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7%
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 756/764 of John Isner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas John Isner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8%
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8%
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4%
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0%
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas John Isner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.