H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Josh Goodall

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Josh Goodall.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Josh Goodall
GBR Age 40 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Josh Goodall 6-3 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #140 Match data Jun 21, 2010 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Josh Goodall #1,803 #187 414 1,552 1 11 8.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Josh Goodall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #334 1,466 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #207 1,536 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #333 1,508 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #198 1,477 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #249 1,429 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #254 1,383 0 0
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 12/12 of Josh Goodall's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Josh Goodall
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 8.0 4.0 51.5% 79.1% 48.8% 56.3% 12.5% 64.6% 27.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 13.5 5.5 54.6% 78.2% 40.8% 63.3% 58.3% 61.1% 27.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 6.5 6.0 52.3% 69.6% 47.4% 29.8% 75.0% 58.8% 25.9%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2008 1/1 13.0 4.0 51.7% 76.7% 53.6% 0.0% — 65.5% 20.4%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2009 4/4 8.0 3.3 52.7% 79.7% 54.5% 48.3% 38.9% 67.6% 31.4%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2012 1/1 21.0 6.0 55.2% 74.3% 55.0% 72.7% 50.0% 65.7% 25.2%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 12/12 10.2 4.5 52.9% 76.9% 50.0% 47.1% 41.4% 64.2% 27.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Josh Goodall
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 101.9 -2.55 -0.48 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — +0.17
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1537 105.1 -0.57 -2.26 0.714 45.5% — — — 14.3% -1.86 — — — +0.18
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1508 102.5 -4.44 -1.90 0.629 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — +0.10
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2008 1478 104.1 +4.04 +1.81 0.591 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2009 1429 102.2 -0.68 +0.06 0.970 50.0% — — +90 36.4% -0.18 0–1 0–2 — +0.17
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2010 1409 101.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2011 1384 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2012 1384 98.6 -0.14 -2.03 0.735 47.7% — — — 25.0% -0.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2013 1379 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2014 1368 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1553 104.0 -1.16 -0.77 0.775 46.5% — — +90 17.6% -1.38 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +4.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.