H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2012 Buenos Aires third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |