H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Juan Monaco H2H: 3-1

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Sao Paulo round of 16 7-6(4) 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Monaco #43 7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #86 Match data Feb 28, 2014* R16 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #92 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 Juan Monaco #42 Match data Feb 13, 2014* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #61 6-2 4-6 6-3 Juan Monaco #14 Match data Mar 23, 2013* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #58 7-6(2) 5-3 (ret.) Juan Monaco #23 Match data Feb 29, 2012* R32 Mexican Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Juan Monaco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — — — — — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 578/587 of Juan Monaco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Juan Monaco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 578/587 2.2 1.9 67.3% 65.9% 52.8% 54.1% 45.8% 61.5% 41.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Juan Monaco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.82
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.19
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.40
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.58
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.07
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.94
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) — +2.65
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.04
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.18
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) — +2.05
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.07
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) — -0.21
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.33
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.