H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-2
Nick Kyrgios holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2016* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2015* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2015* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nick Kyrgios | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(3) | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |