H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-4

Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2015 Hamburg Open first round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #55 6-4 7-6(3) Nicolas Almagro #136 Match data Jul 30, 2015* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #89 6-3 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #68 Match data Feb 27, 2015* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #13 7-6(1) 6-7(4) 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #48 Match data Nov 1, 2012* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Almagro #11 6-4 7-6(4) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #64 Match data Feb 18, 2012* SF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #11 7-6(2) 7-6(4) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #80 Match data Sep 30, 2011* R16 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Nicolas Almagro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — — — — — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Nicolas Almagro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Nicolas Almagro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.