H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2014 Barcelona second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-4 6-4 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |