H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 3-7
Pablo Andujar holds a 7–3 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 5–3 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2022 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 7-5 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
7
10 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |