H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-3

Paolo Lorenzi holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2018 Sydney International round of 16 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Lorenzi #45 6-3 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #22 Match data Jan 12, 2018* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Paolo Lorenzi #46 6-1 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #30 Match data Feb 11, 2017* SF Quito ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #61 6-4 6-3 Paolo Lorenzi #60 Match data Jan 14, 2015* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Paolo Lorenzi #64 7-6(4) 6-1 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #50 Match data Jan 2, 2013* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Paolo Lorenzi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0%
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9%
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1%
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6%
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 +0.05 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 99.4 -0.23 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) 96.4 -0.55 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 94.2 +0.49 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) 95.2 -1.20 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 -1.24 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) 101.8 -2.25 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) 99.4 +3.34 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) 100.6 +2.45 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 97.2 -1.29 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) 89.7 +0.07 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) 93.9 -0.43 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) 97.3 +1.15 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) 93.6 +1.27 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.