H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-3
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2018 Sydney fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-3 7-5 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2017* | Quito | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-1 6-4 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2015* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-4 6-3 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2013* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |