H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 0-4

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2017 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(1) 6-2 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #24 Match data
Apr 23, 2017* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Rafael Nadal #7 6-1 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #24 Match data
Apr 24, 2014* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(2) 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #103 Match data
Apr 27, 2013* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #5 6-3 6-0 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Rafael Nadal
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12
20 — — — — — — — 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17
21 — — — — — — — 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59
28 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91
38 — — — — — — — 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91