H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Ricardas Berankis H2H: 1-1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Ricardas Berankis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay, while Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2021 Marbella fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021* | Marbella | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
| May 3, 2015 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-3 6-3 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2012* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ricardas Berankis | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Ricardas Berankis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |