H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Ricardas Berankis H2H: 1-1

Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Ricardas Berankis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay, while Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2021 Marbella round of 16 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 6-3 4-6 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #88 Match data Apr 9, 2021* R16 Marbella ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #68 6-3 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #81 Match data May 3, 2015 Q2 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Ricardas Berankis #95 4-6 6-4 6-1 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #48 Match data Oct 18, 2012* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ricardas Berankis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ricardas Berankis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ricardas Berankis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Ricardas Berankis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.