H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-1

Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Robin Haase are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay, while Robin Haase leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2017 Canadian Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Haase #52 6-3 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #23 Match data Aug 9, 2017* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #67 6-1 6-1 Robin Haase #87 Match data Apr 14, 2015* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #67 6-4 7-5 Robin Haase #88 Match data Apr 12, 2015 Q2 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Robin Haase #49 6-1 3-6 7-6(10) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #81 Match data Oct 28, 2013 Q1 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Robin Haase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Robin Haase
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 457/459 of Robin Haase's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Robin Haase
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0%
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2%
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0%
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Robin Haase
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.09
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.68
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.36
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) — +0.39
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) — -0.26
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.40
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) — +0.05
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.06
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.19
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.52
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.30
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.27
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.