H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Roger Federer H2H: 1-2

Roger Federer holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Roger Federer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2019 Shanghai Masters third round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2019* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Roger Federer #3 6-2 7-6(5) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #46 Match data
Oct 14, 2015* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Albert Ramos-Vinolas #70 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 Roger Federer #3 Match data
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Roger Federer #3 6-1 6-1 6-1 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Roger Federer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4
21 — — — — — — — 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61
28 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103
38 — — — — — — — 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103