H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 3-0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2018 Shenzhen fourth round 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(3) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 3-6 6-3 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-4 6-4 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |