H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 2-0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 2–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Chengdu fourth round 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-2 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |