H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Mancini vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 0-1
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Mancini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1992 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1992* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Arnaud Boetsch | 7-5 7-6(3) | Alberto Mancini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Mancini | #824 | #8 | 1,510 | 1,991 | 140 | 117 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Mancini | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #49 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #9 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #127 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,717 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #31 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |