H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Mancini vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Alberto Mancini holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alberto Mancini leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Mancini won the 1990 Madrid fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1990* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alberto Mancini | 6-3 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1988* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alberto Mancini | 3-6 6-1 7-6 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Mancini | #824 | #8 | 1,510 | 1,991 | 140 | 117 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Mancini | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #49 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #9 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #127 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,717 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #31 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |