H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alberto Mancini vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-0
Alberto Mancini holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alberto Mancini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alberto Mancini won the 1992 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1992* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Mancini | 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Mancini | #824 | #8 | 1,510 | 1,991 | 140 | 117 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Mancini | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #49 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #9 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #127 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,717 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #31 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |