H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Alberto Mancini vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-0
Alberto Mancini holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alberto Mancini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alberto Mancini won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-3 5-7 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Alberto Mancini | 6-3 6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Mancini | #824 | #8 | 1,510 | 1,991 | 140 | 117 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Mancini | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #49 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #9 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #127 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,717 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #31 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |