H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Mancini vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 1-2
Jaime Oncins holds a 2–1 lead over Alberto Mancini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1992 Sao Paulo semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 6-3 6-3 | Alberto Mancini | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1992* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Alberto Mancini | Match data |
| Nov 24, 1988* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alberto Mancini | 6-1 6-7 6-0 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Mancini | #824 | #8 | 1,510 | 1,991 | 140 | 117 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Mancini | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #49 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #9 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #127 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,717 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #31 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |