H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 London third round 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2000* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 7-5 7-6(5) | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-0 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |