H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Alberto Martin vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-2

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 London round of 32 7-5 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberto Martin
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #10 7-5 7-6(5) Alberto Martin #50 Match data Feb 24, 2000* R32 London ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Cedric Pioline #23 6-0 6-3 Alberto Martin #55 Match data Aug 19, 1999* R32 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,801 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberto Martin Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,712 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,608 0 2 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,675 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,654 0 3 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,623 0 3 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,660 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,623 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,591 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberto Martin Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2000 6 15 21 28.6% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2002 9 10 19 47.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2010 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 53 100 153 34.6% 156 146 302 51.7% 8 16 24 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/485 of Alberto Martin's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alberto Martin Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1996 4/5 0.8 3.5 59.4% 60.1% 55.1% 46.5% 46.6% 58.0% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 20/22 1.9 3.5 65.7% 60.6% 50.2% 60.8% 48.0% 56.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 8/8 1.0 3.8 62.4% 57.5% 33.5% 49.3% 47.5% 48.2% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 37/48 1.8 3.0 66.5% 64.6% 47.3% 57.7% 45.2% 58.8% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 40/48 1.8 3.1 63.4% 63.5% 50.4% 50.5% 43.4% 58.5% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 51/58 2.4 4.5 59.3% 68.8% 50.1% 54.3% 50.0% 61.0% 40.1% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 2002 41/47 1.9 3.4 62.0% 63.3% 49.9% 51.6% 41.8% 58.0% 39.4% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 2003 44/45 1.5 3.9 62.3% 66.4% 48.8% 54.8% 42.5% 59.6% 38.7% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 2004 49/49 2.2 4.0 60.3% 67.0% 49.2% 54.1% 44.7% 59.7% 38.3% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 2005 54/54 2.4 3.3 53.7% 67.2% 50.3% 58.2% 44.7% 59.2% 40.7% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2006 40/40 2.9 3.0 57.9% 66.0% 49.7% 54.4% 41.3% 58.7% 37.8% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2007 17/17 1.8 2.8 57.0% 63.6% 44.7% 50.8% 37.8% 55.8% 39.0% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2008 8/8 2.5 2.5 56.4% 66.0% 49.5% 40.2% 36.6% 58.9% 37.0% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2009 27/27 1.7 2.7 59.1% 64.4% 50.0% 53.6% 35.1% 58.5% 34.5% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 2010 9/9 1.3 2.2 65.5% 62.4% 49.5% 48.5% 57.3% 58.4% 36.5% 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 449/485 2.0 3.4 60.4% 65.3% 49.2% 54.1% 43.9% 58.7% 38.9% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberto Martin Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1502 99.4 -0.97 -1.12 0.900 47.9% — +22 — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1547 128.2 -2.35 +1.69 0.970 49.5% — +31 — 43.6% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1490 102.2 -4.79 -2.31 0.636 40.9% 0 +67 — 15.8% -2.68 1–0 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1712 133.5 -2.31 +1.21 0.966 49.4% -216 +60 -76 52.6% +0.09 7–4 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 106.0 +0.83 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 2000 1608 131.3 -2.69 +0.88 0.955 49.2% -119 +143 -2 41.2% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.40 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 2001 1675 140.9 -0.51 +1.16 1.030 50.5% -64 +114 — 53.7% +0.11 11–13 (46%) 9–2 (82%) 105.2 +0.86 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 2002 1700 141.3 -2.44 +1.41 0.938 48.5% -17 +63 — 46.8% -0.34 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 -2.23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 2003 1655 124.7 -1.98 +0.48 0.958 49.2% +14 +19 — 42.3% -0.50 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.6 +0.26 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 2004 1623 133.1 -2.39 +1.11 0.951 48.9% -29 +128 — 44.9% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.7 -0.50 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 2005 1660 145.8 -1.58 +2.44 0.998 50.0% -76 +132 -211 42.5% -0.53 9–4 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 105.4 -1.73 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 2006 1624 129.7 -2.69 +0.56 0.917 48.2% -113 +148 — 45.7% -0.32 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 99.4 -0.43 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2007 1624 123.2 -3.59 +1.46 0.881 47.0% -130 +105 — 29.7% -1.49 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -1.47 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2008 1645 112.3 -2.97 +0.67 0.900 48.0% — +60 — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.37 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2009 1585 128.0 -3.17 -1.98 0.831 46.5% -33 +62 -107 30.5% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.6 -0.14 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 2010 1592 115.8 -2.74 -1.64 0.876 47.6% — +61 — 61.1% +0.78 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +1.05 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1801 137.1 -2.23 +0.89 0.944 48.8% -68 +90 -94 44.5% -0.43 70–66 (51%) 72–71 (50%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.