H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Alberto Martin vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-1

Alberto Martin and Diego Nargiso are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 2000 Palermo quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberto Martin
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Nargiso #249 6-4 6-3 Alberto Martin #63 Match data Sep 30, 2000* QF Palermo ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alberto Martin #45 6-1 6-4 Diego Nargiso #172 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,801 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberto Martin Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,490 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,712 0 2 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,608 0 2 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,675 0 3 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,654 0 3 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,623 0 3 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,660 0 3 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,623 0 3 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberto Martin Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2000 6 15 21 28.6% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 2002 9 10 19 47.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 2010 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 100 153 34.6% 156 146 302 51.7% 8 16 24 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/485 of Alberto Martin's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alberto Martin Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1996 4/5 0.8 3.5 59.4% 60.1% 55.1% 46.5% 46.6% 58.0% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 20/22 1.9 3.5 65.7% 60.6% 50.2% 60.8% 48.0% 56.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 8/8 1.0 3.8 62.4% 57.5% 33.5% 49.3% 47.5% 48.2% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 37/48 1.8 3.0 66.5% 64.6% 47.3% 57.7% 45.2% 58.8% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 40/48 1.8 3.1 63.4% 63.5% 50.4% 50.5% 43.4% 58.5% 39.6% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 2001 51/58 2.4 4.5 59.3% 68.8% 50.1% 54.3% 50.0% 61.0% 40.1% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 2002 41/47 1.9 3.4 62.0% 63.3% 49.9% 51.6% 41.8% 58.0% 39.4% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 2003 44/45 1.5 3.9 62.3% 66.4% 48.8% 54.8% 42.5% 59.6% 38.7% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 2004 49/49 2.2 4.0 60.3% 67.0% 49.2% 54.1% 44.7% 59.7% 38.3% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 2005 54/54 2.4 3.3 53.7% 67.2% 50.3% 58.2% 44.7% 59.2% 40.7% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 2006 40/40 2.9 3.0 57.9% 66.0% 49.7% 54.4% 41.3% 58.7% 37.8% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 2007 17/17 1.8 2.8 57.0% 63.6% 44.7% 50.8% 37.8% 55.8% 39.0% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 2008 8/8 2.5 2.5 56.4% 66.0% 49.5% 40.2% 36.6% 58.9% 37.0% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 2009 27/27 1.7 2.7 59.1% 64.4% 50.0% 53.6% 35.1% 58.5% 34.5% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 2010 9/9 1.3 2.2 65.5% 62.4% 49.5% 48.5% 57.3% 58.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/485 2.0 3.4 60.4% 65.3% 49.2% 54.1% 43.9% 58.7% 38.9% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberto Martin Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1502 99.4 -0.97 -1.12 0.900 47.9% — +22 — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1997 1547 128.2 -2.35 +1.69 0.970 49.5% — +31 — 43.6% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.18 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 1998 1490 102.2 -4.79 -2.31 0.636 40.9% 0 +67 — 15.8% -2.68 1–0 0–1 — +0.15 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 1999 1712 133.5 -2.31 +1.21 0.966 49.4% -216 +60 -76 52.6% +0.09 7–4 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 106.0 +0.83 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 2000 1608 131.3 -2.69 +0.88 0.955 49.2% -119 +143 -2 41.2% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.40 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 2001 1675 140.9 -0.51 +1.16 1.030 50.5% -64 +114 — 53.7% +0.11 11–13 (46%) 9–2 (82%) 105.2 +0.86 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 2002 1700 141.3 -2.44 +1.41 0.938 48.5% -17 +63 — 46.8% -0.34 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 -2.23 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 2003 1655 124.7 -1.98 +0.48 0.958 49.2% +14 +19 — 42.3% -0.50 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.6 +0.26 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 2004 1623 133.1 -2.39 +1.11 0.951 48.9% -29 +128 — 44.9% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.7 -0.50 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 2005 1660 145.8 -1.58 +2.44 0.998 50.0% -76 +132 -211 42.5% -0.53 9–4 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 105.4 -1.73 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 2006 1624 129.7 -2.69 +0.56 0.917 48.2% -113 +148 — 45.7% -0.32 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 99.4 -0.43 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 2007 1624 123.2 -3.59 +1.46 0.881 47.0% -130 +105 — 29.7% -1.49 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -1.47 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 2008 1645 112.3 -2.97 +0.67 0.900 48.0% — +60 — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.37 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 2009 1585 128.0 -3.17 -1.98 0.831 46.5% -33 +62 -107 30.5% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.6 -0.14 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
31 2010 1592 115.8 -2.74 -1.64 0.876 47.6% — +61 — 61.1% +0.78 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 137.1 -2.23 +0.89 0.944 48.8% -68 +90 -94 44.5% -0.43 70–66 (51%) 72–71 (50%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.