H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-1
Alberto Martin and Diego Nargiso are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 2000 Palermo quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2000* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Diego Nargiso | 6-4 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1999* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-1 6-4 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |