H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Alberto Martin vs Michael Russell H2H: 1-0

Alberto Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Russell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alberto Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2001 Cincinnati Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberto Martin
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Michael Russell
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alberto Martin #38 4-6 6-3 6-2 Michael Russell #86 Match data Aug 8, 2001* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,801 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Michael Russell #1,124 #60 693 1,809 77 150 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberto Martin Michael Russell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,712 0 2 1998 0–2 0.0% #288 1,473 0 0
21 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,608 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,675 0 3 2000 1–6 14.3% #155 1,507 0 0
23 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3 2001 8–17 32.0% #87 1,573 0 0
24 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,654 0 3 2002 5–15 25.0% #157 1,511 0 0
25 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,623 0 3 2003 1–1 50.0% #502 1,530 0 0
26 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,660 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,623 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3 2006 0–2 0.0% #144 1,563 0 0
29 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3 2007 10–19 34.5% #82 1,617 0 0
30 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3 2008 3–5 37.5% #242 1,610 0 0
31 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,591 0 3 2009 2–4 33.3% #83 1,636 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 11–23 32.4% #99 1,628 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2011 12–18 40.0% #99 1,748 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2012 11–11 50.0% #87 1,749 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2013 7–15 31.8% #92 1,638 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2014 6–11 35.3% #158 1,582 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #557 1,611 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberto Martin Michael Russell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 6 15 21 28.6% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 9 10 19 47.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 0 8 8 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 15 25 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 11 12 23 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 8 14 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 100 153 34.6% 156 146 302 51.7% 8 16 24 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — 55 92 147 37.4% 12 35 47 25.5% 10 23 33 30.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/485 of Alberto Martin's and 221/227 of Michael Russell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alberto Martin Michael Russell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1996 4/5 0.8 3.5 59.4% 60.1% 55.1% 46.5% 46.6% 58.0% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 20/22 1.9 3.5 65.7% 60.6% 50.2% 60.8% 48.0% 56.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 8/8 1.0 3.8 62.4% 57.5% 33.5% 49.3% 47.5% 48.2% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 37/48 1.8 3.0 66.5% 64.6% 47.3% 57.7% 45.2% 58.8% 39.8% 1998 1/2 4.0 4.0 62.7% 65.8% 51.1% 37.5% 30.0% 60.3% 37.7%
21 2000 40/48 1.8 3.1 63.4% 63.5% 50.4% 50.5% 43.4% 58.5% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 51/58 2.4 4.5 59.3% 68.8% 50.1% 54.3% 50.0% 61.0% 40.1% 2000 6/7 3.8 6.5 61.4% 65.1% 45.0% 50.8% 61.1% 57.3% 37.1%
23 2002 41/47 1.9 3.4 62.0% 63.3% 49.9% 51.6% 41.8% 58.0% 39.4% 2001 23/25 2.4 3.0 68.9% 63.2% 46.6% 46.6% 39.5% 57.9% 38.3%
24 2003 44/45 1.5 3.9 62.3% 66.4% 48.8% 54.8% 42.5% 59.6% 38.7% 2002 18/20 1.9 2.5 69.4% 60.3% 48.8% 54.0% 33.9% 56.8% 37.1%
25 2004 49/49 2.2 4.0 60.3% 67.0% 49.2% 54.1% 44.7% 59.7% 38.3% 2003 2/2 1.0 4.5 67.5% 66.0% 49.4% 73.3% 35.4% 60.5% 39.0%
26 2005 54/54 2.4 3.3 53.7% 67.2% 50.3% 58.2% 44.7% 59.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 40/40 2.9 3.0 57.9% 66.0% 49.7% 54.4% 41.3% 58.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 17/17 1.8 2.8 57.0% 63.6% 44.7% 50.8% 37.8% 55.8% 39.0% 2006 2/2 1.5 4.0 66.0% 58.1% 43.8% 46.9% 39.6% 53.1% 39.4%
29 2008 8/8 2.5 2.5 56.4% 66.0% 49.5% 40.2% 36.6% 58.9% 37.0% 2007 29/29 2.0 2.6 68.1% 65.3% 47.3% 53.1% 44.2% 59.4% 34.6%
30 2009 27/27 1.7 2.7 59.1% 64.4% 50.0% 53.6% 35.1% 58.5% 34.5% 2008 8/8 3.5 2.8 66.4% 64.4% 51.9% 54.5% 46.5% 60.3% 41.2%
31 2010 9/9 1.3 2.2 65.5% 62.4% 49.5% 48.5% 57.3% 58.4% 36.5% 2009 6/6 1.8 2.7 69.8% 63.9% 51.0% 57.2% 33.1% 59.6% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/34 2.8 3.4 65.1% 63.6% 49.0% 48.2% 39.5% 58.7% 35.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 30/30 2.9 4.2 63.3% 70.0% 47.0% 48.6% 46.5% 61.2% 35.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 22/22 3.0 3.8 63.7% 67.2% 50.5% 46.4% 51.2% 61.0% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 22/22 2.6 2.6 64.2% 65.6% 47.0% 47.6% 40.4% 58.9% 36.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 2.3 3.4 62.5% 64.5% 48.4% 51.8% 39.0% 58.9% 36.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 4.0 7.0 62.7% 54.2% 42.1% 60.9% 23.5% 49.7% 40.2%
Career — 449/485 2.0 3.4 60.4% 65.3% 49.2% 54.1% 43.9% 58.7% 38.9% — 221/227 2.6 3.3 65.7% 65.0% 48.1% 50.0% 42.4% 59.1% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberto Martin Michael Russell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1502 99.4 -0.97 -1.12 0.900 47.9% — +22 — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1547 128.2 -2.35 +1.69 0.970 49.5% — +31 — 43.6% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1490 102.2 -4.79 -2.31 0.636 40.9% 0 +67 — 15.8% -2.68 1–0 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1712 133.5 -2.31 +1.21 0.966 49.4% -216 +60 -76 52.6% +0.09 7–4 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 106.0 +0.83 1998 1473 105.5 -1.20 -1.55 0.950 48.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 — — — +0.13
21 2000 1608 131.3 -2.69 +0.88 0.955 49.2% -119 +143 -2 41.2% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1675 140.9 -0.51 +1.16 1.030 50.5% -64 +114 — 53.7% +0.11 11–13 (46%) 9–2 (82%) 105.2 +0.86 2000 1507 103.7 -2.23 -1.34 0.871 47.5% — -15 — 33.3% -1.14 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 +0.65
23 2002 1700 141.3 -2.44 +1.41 0.938 48.5% -17 +63 — 46.8% -0.34 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 -2.23 2001 1573 122.4 -1.89 +0.09 0.908 47.9% -32 +20 — 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 3–6 (33%) 97.0 -0.46
24 2003 1655 124.7 -1.98 +0.48 0.958 49.2% +14 +19 — 42.3% -0.50 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.6 +0.26 2002 1512 111.5 -4.18 -0.10 0.860 47.1% +27 -42 +56 30.6% -1.31 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 97.2 0.00
25 2004 1623 133.1 -2.39 +1.11 0.951 48.9% -29 +128 — 44.9% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.7 -0.50 2003 1530 108.4 0.00 +2.07 0.988 49.6% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.19
26 2005 1660 145.8 -1.58 +2.44 0.998 50.0% -76 +132 -211 42.5% -0.53 9–4 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 105.4 -1.73 2004 1548 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1624 129.7 -2.69 +0.56 0.917 48.2% -113 +148 — 45.7% -0.32 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 99.4 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1624 123.2 -3.59 +1.46 0.881 47.0% -130 +105 — 29.7% -1.49 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -1.47 2006 1563 110.1 -2.13 -0.63 0.839 46.4% — — — 25.0% -1.00 — 0–1 — -0.01
29 2008 1645 112.3 -2.97 +0.67 0.900 48.0% — +60 — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.37 2007 1617 131.4 -2.18 -0.79 0.851 47.4% +33 -140 -127 37.5% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 99.8 -1.61
30 2009 1585 128.0 -3.17 -1.98 0.831 46.5% -33 +62 -107 30.5% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.6 -0.14 2008 1610 122.6 -0.43 +2.15 1.039 50.9% +29 — — 40.9% -0.14 1–2 (33%) — — +0.39
31 2010 1592 115.8 -2.74 -1.64 0.876 47.6% — +61 — 61.1% +0.78 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +1.05 2009 1636 122.0 -2.07 +1.17 0.956 49.0% +31 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1629 131.7 -3.68 -0.27 0.871 47.2% +47 -171 -147 37.2% -0.87 3–7 (30%) 4–8 (33%) 94.3 -0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1748 137.8 -1.30 -0.31 0.912 48.4% +61 -283 -272 38.0% -0.62 3–2 (60%) 4–10 (29%) 97.8 -0.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1750 129.2 -1.23 -0.23 0.964 49.4% -28 -166 -145 48.3% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1639 129.7 -3.05 -0.32 0.880 47.7% +17 -109 +24 37.5% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.9 +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1582 133.8 -3.02 -0.10 0.891 47.9% +93 -76 — 41.3% -0.72 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 101.9 +0.34
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1611 117.2 +1.80 +0.23 0.798 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14
Career — 1801 137.1 -2.23 +0.89 0.944 48.8% -68 +90 -94 44.5% -0.43 70–66 (51%) 72–71 (50%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1810 133.9 -2.37 -0.17 0.897 48.0% +30 -88 -82 38.4% -0.75 23–41 (36%) 35–48 (42%) 91.4 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.