H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 2-0
Alberto Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alberto Martin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2006 Auckland third round 7-6(1) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2008 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Alberto Martin | 2-3 (ret.) | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alberto Martin | 7-6(1) 3-6 6-2 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |