H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Matteo Berrettini H2H: 1-1
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina and Matteo Berrettini are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alejandro Davidovich Fokina leads 1–0 on clay, while Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2022 US Open fourth round 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2021* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 7-5 6-3 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | #20 | #14 | 2,635 | 1,974 | 177 | 153 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Matteo Berrettini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #52 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #50 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2023 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2025 | 44–26 | 62.9% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 |