H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Tomas Machac H2H: 1-2
Tomas Machac holds a 2–1 lead over Alejandro Davidovich Fokina in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Machac leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Alejandro Davidovich Fokina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2025 Abierto Mexicano Telcel Presentado Por HSBC final 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2025* | Abierto Mexicano Telcel Presentado Por HSBC | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Tomas Machac | 7-6 6-2 | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2024* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2024* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | (w/o) | Tomas Machac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | #20 | #14 | 2,635 | 1,974 | 177 | 153 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Tomas Machac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #52 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #50 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 44–26 | 62.9% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |