H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:34 UTC
Alejandro Tabilo vs Quentin Halys H2H: 0-1
Quentin Halys holds a 1–0 lead over Alejandro Tabilo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Quentin Halys won the 2026 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 29
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Quentin Halys | 6-2 6-2 7-6(2) | Alejandro Tabilo | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2022 | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | Q1 | Grass | Quentin Halys | 6-2 6-3 | Alejandro Tabilo | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Tabilo | #31 | #19 | 2,043 | 1,880 | 84 | 78 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Tabilo | Quentin Halys | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #169 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |