H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-0
Alex Antonitsch holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Antonitsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1990 Toronto Indoor second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1990* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Alex Antonitsch | 6-4 7-6 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |