Alex Antonitsch
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 31, 1994 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 21, 1994 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 22, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 0-3
Luiz Mattar holds a 3–0 lead over Alex Antonitsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1993 ASB Classic round of 16 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 6-2 6-3 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data | Jan 15, 1993* | R16 | ASB Classic | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Luiz Mattar | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data | Jul 22, 1992* | R64 | Austrian Open Kitzbühel | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Luiz Mattar | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data | May 12, 1989* | R16 | Charleston | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 134 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #172 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1991 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 26 | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% |
| 27 | 1993 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1994 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 50 | 62 | 112 | 44.6% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 16 | 17 | 33 | 48.5% | 17 | 31 | 48 | 35.4% | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 112/123 of Alex Antonitsch's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | 1991 | 22/25 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 52.8% | 66.9% | 48.0% | 57.8% | 42.0% | 58.1% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 24/27 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 58.2% | 66.5% | 48.6% | 55.8% | 46.9% | 58.9% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 30/32 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 56.3% | 73.7% | 52.0% | 65.0% | 36.3% | 63.9% | 36.3% | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 58.4% | 66.6% | 49.4% | 53.2% | 43.5% | 59.5% | 37.0% |
| 28 | 1994 | 30/33 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 54.2% | 68.7% | 46.8% | 61.6% | 43.6% | 58.9% | 37.5% | 1992 | 34/38 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 56.2% | 71.6% | 53.0% | 64.9% | 45.9% | 63.5% | 37.5% |
| 29 | 1995 | 6/6 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 52.5% | 70.9% | 40.3% | 50.4% | 18.3% | 56.0% | 31.0% | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 55.1% | 69.5% | 50.3% | 59.1% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 35.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28/38 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 67.2% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 35.7% | 60.5% | 36.2% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 61.4% | 61.9% | 57.0% | 69.4% | 53.6% | 60.1% | 28.4% |
| Career | — | 112/234 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 55.2% | 69.3% | 48.4% | 59.9% | 40.7% | 59.9% | 36.8% | — | 143/339 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 57.4% | 68.3% | 51.2% | 59.0% | 42.4% | 61.0% | 36.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1985 | 1518 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | 50.0% | -0.20 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1523 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +77 | — | 40.0% | -1.47 | 1–0 | 4–0 (100%) | — | +0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 1534 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +74 | — | 48.0% | -0.70 | 2–7 (22%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 1497 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +79 | — | 31.4% | -1.22 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | -0.63 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1592 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +9 | — | 49.1% | +0.19 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.09 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1701 | 142.8 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -90 | -33 | 53.8% | -0.03 | 11–5 (69%) | 14–4 (78%) | — | -1.28 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1592 | 122.0 | -2.73 | -0.33 | 0.929 | 48.8% | +27 | — | — | 41.8% | -0.49 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.10 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1632 | 131.9 | -1.83 | -0.96 | 0.880 | 47.6% | -6 | — | +90 | 44.4% | -0.49 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | -0.10 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1571 | 119.9 | +0.94 | -1.73 | 1.006 | 50.2% | +7 | — | +115 | 43.2% | +0.04 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–17 (19%) | — | +2.93 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1582 | 128.8 | -1.59 | -0.59 | 0.912 | 48.4% | +12 | — | +74 | 39.5% | -0.86 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -1.20 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1525 | 98.7 | -2.47 | -3.22 | 0.705 | 43.8% | +59 | -16 | — | 27.3% | -1.27 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.28 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 |
| Career | — | 1820 | 133.4 | -1.23 | -1.06 | 0.919 | 48.5% | +2 | +24 | +54 | 44.5% | -0.43 | 39–43 (48%) | 54–40 (57%) | 106.9 | +0.76 | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |