Alex Antonitsch
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 31, 1994 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 21, 1994 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 22, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-1
Alex Antonitsch and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alex Antonitsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1994 Osaka round of 32 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Mar 31, 1994* | R32 | Osaka | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-2 6-1 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data | Mar 11, 1993* | R32 | Zaragoza | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 134 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alex Antonitsch | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #172 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Alex Antonitsch | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1988 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1989 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1990 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1991 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1993 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1994 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 50 | 62 | 112 | 44.6% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 16 | 17 | 33 | 48.5% | 17 | 31 | 48 | 35.4% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Alex Antonitsch | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1985 | 1518 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | 50.0% | -0.20 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1986 | 1523 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +77 | — | 40.0% | -1.47 | 1–0 | 4–0 (100%) | — | +0.74 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1987 | 1534 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +74 | — | 48.0% | -0.70 | 2–7 (22%) | 6–1 (86%) | 100.7 | +0.84 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1988 | 1497 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +79 | — | 31.4% | -1.22 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.7 | -0.63 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1989 | 1592 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +9 | — | 49.1% | +0.19 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.5 | -0.09 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1990 | 1701 | 142.8 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -90 | -33 | 53.8% | -0.03 | 11–5 (69%) | 14–4 (78%) | 115.6 | -1.28 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1991 | 1592 | 122.0 | -2.73 | -0.33 | 0.929 | 48.8% | +27 | — | — | 41.8% | -0.49 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.9 | +0.09 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1992 | 1632 | 131.9 | -1.83 | -0.96 | 0.880 | 47.6% | -6 | — | +90 | 44.4% | -0.49 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–2 (80%) | 108.4 | -0.10 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1993 | 1571 | 119.9 | +0.94 | -1.73 | 1.006 | 50.2% | +7 | — | +115 | 43.2% | +0.04 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–17 (19%) | 91.7 | +2.93 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 1994 | 1582 | 128.8 | -1.59 | -0.59 | 0.912 | 48.4% | +12 | — | +74 | 39.5% | -0.86 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–7 (46%) | 94.5 | -1.20 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 1995 | 1525 | 98.7 | -2.47 | -3.22 | 0.705 | 43.8% | +59 | -16 | — | 27.3% | -1.27 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.28 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 1820 | 133.4 | -1.23 | -1.06 | 0.919 | 48.5% | +2 | +24 | +54 | 44.5% | -0.43 | 39–43 (48%) | 54–40 (57%) | 106.9 | +0.75 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Martin Damm Sr
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |