H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-2
Michiel Schapers holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Antonitsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1992 Newport third round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1992* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Alex Antonitsch | 6-2 7-6(4) | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michiel Schapers | 4-6 6-4 6-4 7-6 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1988* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michiel Schapers | 6-4 6-3 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |