H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Peter Doohan H2H: 0-1
Peter Doohan holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Antonitsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Doohan won the 1987 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-5 6-2 4-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Peter Doohan | 4-6 7-5 6-2 4-6 9-7 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |