H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Todd Witsken H2H: 1-0
Alex Antonitsch holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Antonitsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1991 Hong Kong fourth round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1991* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alex Antonitsch | 6-1 7-6(3) | Todd Witsken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Todd Witsken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |