H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Antonitsch vs Udo Riglewski H2H: 1-1
Alex Antonitsch and Udo Riglewski are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Udo Riglewski leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alex Antonitsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1991 Auckland third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 59
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1991* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alex Antonitsch | 6-3 6-0 | Udo Riglewski | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1989* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Udo Riglewski | 6-4 6-2 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Udo Riglewski | #1,274 | #82 | 394 | 1,655 | 43 | 79 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Antonitsch | Udo Riglewski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #371 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #88 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #369 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1153 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |