H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-1
Alex Calatrava and Albert Portas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 1999 Casablanca fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1999* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1998* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Alex Calatrava | 6-2 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |