H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-1
Alex Calatrava and Hyung-Taik Lee are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2005 Roland Garros first round 6-4 2-6 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2006 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Alex Calatrava | 6-3 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 2-6 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| May 24, 2001* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Calatrava | 6-3 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alex Calatrava | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |