H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 1999 Memphis third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1999* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-4 6-2 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |