H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Alex Calatrava vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-1

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 St. Petersburg round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Calatrava
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #54 4-6 6-3 6-3 Alex Calatrava #113 Match data Feb 11, 1999* R32 St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alex Calatrava #1,017 #44 841 1,699 69 109 38.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Calatrava Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #250 1,483 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1995 0–1 0.0% #239 1,474 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1998 11–18 37.9% #114 1,474 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1999 2–10 16.7% #172 1,425 0 0 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 2000 20–10 66.7% #56 1,645 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2001 18–29 38.3% #100 1,552 0 1 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #133 1,567 0 1 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2003 0–3 0.0% #142 1,558 0 1 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2004 6–7 46.2% #81 1,565 0 1 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2005 4–17 19.0% #202 1,471 0 1 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2006 2–3 40.0% #180 1,463 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alex Calatrava Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2000 9 5 14 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2001 6 13 19 31.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 3 12 15 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 32 54 40.7% 46 68 114 40.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/178 of Alex Calatrava's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alex Calatrava Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1994 1/1 4.0 6.0 40.3% 52.0% 35.1% 33.3% 60.0% 41.9% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.1% 67.6% 33.3% 58.3% 66.7% 51.6% 31.3% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1998 22/29 7.3 2.8 59.6% 71.9% 48.2% 53.9% 46.8% 62.2% 33.3% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1999 8/12 8.6 4.3 54.3% 70.7% 45.6% 54.9% 37.7% 58.7% 33.3% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 2000 27/30 6.7 1.7 57.2% 76.7% 50.7% 58.7% 49.0% 65.8% 38.5% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2001 39/47 5.6 2.1 56.8% 70.7% 47.6% 60.8% 38.9% 60.9% 35.3% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2002 15/16 5.8 1.1 62.3% 65.8% 49.1% 62.8% 45.4% 59.4% 32.0% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2003 3/3 2.7 2.3 55.3% 51.9% 45.1% 43.3% 24.4% 47.9% 29.4% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2004 12/13 4.8 1.8 65.5% 64.4% 53.9% 44.4% 48.2% 60.8% 40.6% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2005 21/21 5.0 2.1 65.2% 68.5% 42.6% 52.8% 34.2% 59.6% 33.5% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
33 2006 5/5 7.6 1.4 61.8% 72.1% 53.1% 69.0% 28.7% 65.6% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/178 6.0 2.1 59.5% 70.2% 48.0% 56.7% 42.2% 61.2% 35.3% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alex Calatrava Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1994 1483 96.5 -1.82 -0.70 0.746 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.07 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1995 1475 100.9 +1.70 +0.98 0.645 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1998 1474 117.8 +0.88 -3.59 0.882 48.4% — +24 — 33.3% -0.71 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.70 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1999 1425 107.7 -1.15 -3.07 0.807 46.7% +102 -1 — 28.6% -1.50 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.16 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 2000 1646 127.3 +2.67 -0.36 1.124 52.2% -38 -41 — 59.1% +0.58 7–5 (58%) 10–5 (67%) — +1.08 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 2001 1552 131.5 -0.46 -2.11 0.904 48.5% +5 +91 — 42.9% -0.29 7–11 (39%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.30 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2002 1568 116.6 -0.93 -2.31 0.788 46.1% +11 +59 — 42.5% -0.32 4–1 (80%) 0–5 (0%) — +0.44 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2003 1559 112.8 -2.62 -1.18 0.565 39.0% — — — 0.0% -3.57 — — — -0.26 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2004 1565 116.8 -0.23 +0.33 1.035 50.6% — +69 — 48.6% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.71 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2005 1471 114.2 -1.36 -2.82 0.829 46.5% -2 +55 — 29.6% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.24 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 2006 1464 107.1 +0.25 -0.76 1.070 51.2% — +65 — 46.2% +0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.31 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
34 2007 1455 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1700 125.5 +0.08 -1.90 0.910 48.5% -2 +41 — 40.8% -0.44 26–39 (40%) 26–44 (37%) 91.9 +1.50 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.