H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-1
Alex Calatrava and Nicolas Escude are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Calatrava leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2002 Australian Open second round 2-6 2-6 6-4 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 2-6 2-6 6-4 7-5 6-4 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2001* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Calatrava | 6-3 7-6(4) | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |