H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 0-1
Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2000 Amsterdam quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2000* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Raemon Sluiter | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |