H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:34 UTC
Alexander Bublik vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 2-1
Alexander Bublik holds a 2–1 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alexander Bublik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Bublik won the 2026 Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026* | Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexander Bublik | 6-3 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2025* | Generali Open | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Alexander Bublik | 6-3 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2024* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Alexander Bublik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Bublik | #11 | #10 | 3,445 | 2,065 | 200 | 174 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Bublik | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #162 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #50 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #36 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #32 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #33 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #11 | 2,002 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #11 | 1,881 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |