H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Alexander Bublik vs Grigor Dimitrov H2H: 3-3

Alexander Bublik and Grigor Dimitrov are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Alexander Bublik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2023 Paris Masters fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexander Bublik
Kazakhstan Age 29 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 2023* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #17 6-2 6-2 Alexander Bublik #33 Match data
Feb 25, 2023* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Alexander Bublik #50 7-5 3-6 7-6(6) Grigor Dimitrov #25 Match data
Mar 15, 2022* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #35 6-3 6-4 Alexander Bublik #33 Match data
Aug 18, 2021* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #21 6-3 7-5 Alexander Bublik #38 Match data
Jul 1, 2021* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Alexander Bublik #11 6-4 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Grigor Dimitrov #47 Match data
Sep 28, 2019* Chengdu ATP 250 QF Hard Alexander Bublik #71 5-7 7-6(9) 7-6(3) Grigor Dimitrov #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alexander Bublik #11 #10 3,445 2,065 200 174 53.5% 0 0 0 2 7 9
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexander Bublik Grigor Dimitrov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0
19 2016 2–2 50.0% #205 1,558 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0
20 2017 3–3 50.0% #117 1,631 0 0 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0
21 2018 1–4 20.0% #162 1,613 0 0 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0
22 2019 13–14 48.1% #56 1,727 0 0 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1
23 2020 12–16 42.9% #50 1,736 0 0 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4
24 2021 33–28 54.1% #36 1,761 0 0 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4
25 2022 30–25 54.5% #37 1,849 0 1 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4
26 2023 22–24 47.8% #32 1,831 0 3 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8
27 2024 25–23 52.1% #33 1,746 0 4 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8
28 2025 37–20 64.9% #11 2,002 0 8 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8
29 2026 22–15 59.5% #11 1,881 0 9 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9