H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-1
Alexander Volkov and Andrei Chesnokov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexander Volkov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1989 Munich semifinal 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1989* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-2 7-5 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1989* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 6-1 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |