H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 2-1
Alexander Volkov holds a 2–1 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alexander Volkov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1992 Wellington fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1992* | Wellington | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| May 8, 1991* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alexander Volkov | 6-1 7-6(12) | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1989* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Gilad Bloom | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |