H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 1-3
Ivan Lendl holds a 3–1 lead over Alexander Volkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1993 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-7(1) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1993* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-4 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1992* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1990* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1987* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-3 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Ivan Lendl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 |