H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Jaime Fillol H2H: 1-0
Alexander Volkov holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Volkov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1971 Roland Garros first round 6-3 9-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1971* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 9-7 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 |