H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-3
Jim Courier holds a 3–1 lead over Alexander Volkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1995 Hong Kong quarterfinal 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1995* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jim Courier | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1994* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Courier | 6-1 6-4 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1992* | Brussels | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jim Courier | 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1990* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 7-6 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |