H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Jim Grabb H2H: 4-0
Alexander Volkov holds a 4–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alexander Volkov leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1994 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1994* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 6-4 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1992* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1991* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1990* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 4-6 7-6 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |